Socrates vs Thrasymachus

Any contention depends upon some principal understanding about the issue being examined. Anyway extraordinary the partition in sentiment might be, there must exist probably some likeness in the participants’ way of survey the issue if an answer is ever to be reached. Book One of Plato’s Republic includes a contradiction among Socrates and Thrasymachus about the idea of equity. The disaccord between their perspectives regarding the matter is amazingly articulated, however there are sure fundamental understandings which manage the course of the debate.One approach to assess the legitimacy of the contentions included is to look at whether the suspicions at the base of the contention are as per this shared conviction. By my perusing of the exchange, Socrates’ answer to the initial segment of Thrasymachus’ meaning of equity rests securely upon this shared belief, while his response to Thrasymachus’ second definition moves from this commonly worthy base, and is harmed therefore. In investigating this subject, I mean to inspect quickly Thrasymachus’ two-section meaning of justice.For every one of these parts I will assess one Socratic reaction and talk about it from the point of view of the â€Å"craftsman analogy† †a relationship which is at first utilized by regular assent, yet which Socrates adjusts until its unique use nearly vanishes. Thrasymachus’ first meaning of equity is anything but difficult to state, however it isn't so quickly clear how it is to be deciphered. Equity, he guarantees, is the upside of the more grounded. All alone, such a sentence could infer, that what is advantageous to the more grounded is only for and hence, helpful to the more vulnerable, and Socrates as needs be asks whether this comprehension is accurate.Thrasymachus quickly reacts in the negative. The translation he continues to clarify upon can be summarized by adjusting marginally his unique definition: equity is what get s the upside of the more grounded. To help this definition, he focuses to the case of administering a city. Any decision class will form the laws of the ward with a view to its own advantage, he states. Since it is simply to comply with the law, the individuals who carry on fairly will be representing the benefit of the rulers (whom Thrasymachus reciprocally terms â€Å"the stronger†).Socrates makes his first protest as of now, however I will treat this here just by chance: only to the extent that it permits us to perceive any reason why Thrasymachus presents the skilled worker relationship. Socrates protests that rulers are, as people, bound to commit errors †to mistake their disservice for their preferred position once in a while. For this situation only acquiescence to laws would work to the ruler’s impediment. Thrasymachus reacts immediately, saying that a man who commits an error in deciding isn't at that point a ruler in the severe sense, and acquaints the s killed worker relationship with help this idea.Insofar as a man is an expert, he won't commit any errors; botches are established in obliviousness, thus can possibly happen when a man’s information on his specialty is inadequate. The issue which Socrates presents is hence kept away from by Thrasymachus’ capability that blunders are never made by rulers as rulers. Despite the fact that the similarity works from the start to Thrasymachus’ advantage, Socrates immediately turns it against him in another complaint. All expressions, he states, are practiced with a view to the advantage of the subject as opposed to the advantage of the artisan.The specialist utilizes his clinical workmanship for the improvement of the patient, the pilot explores for the security of the boat and the mariners, etc. Like Thrasymachus, he recognizes administering as a workmanship, and cases that administering additionally is practiced with a view to the subjects’ advantage. All thro ugh the contention, Thrasymachus latently consents to Socrates’ singular focuses. Be that as it may, as we will see later, he dismisses the end drawn from these. From a goal perspective, one quickly faulty part of this contention is Socrates’ thought that administering is a craftsmanship in a similar sense that medication and route are arts.Despite its expected shortcoming in any case, Socrates’ utilization of the relationship is the one piece of the contention which Thrasymachus can't address without bringing Socrates’ first protest by and by into debate. In this manner this meaning of administering structures some piece of the shared opinion I have recently referenced. Albeit a complaint, for example, this may influence the target legitimacy of the contention, it is essential to remember the way that Socrates isn't endeavoring to make an incontestable meaning of equity at this point.He is simply noting an invalid contention by exhibiting its shortcoming s in wording which compare to Thrasymachus’ viewpoint. Disturbed by Socrates’ line of thinking, Thrasymachus continues to exclaim an updated rendition of his unique explanation. Thrasymachus claims that foul play is more liberated and more grounded than equity and that it brings about a more joyful life. As in the previous definition, he doesn't consider so much what equity is as what it does; he rates the subject with respect to its advantageousness or scarcity in that department. Basically, this definition is an outrageous augmentation of the past one.Also, the model he utilizes for help †that of a despot fulfilled incredible and in this manner through treachery †notices back to his underlying definition as administering being the benefit of the more grounded. Unmistakably Thrasymachus has not been persuaded by Socrates’ last contention, regardless of his obvious concurrence with Socrates’ focuses. He is contending in various terms, yet in rea l substance this new improvement is minimal in excess of an exposed logical inconsistency of Socrates’ past contention. He despite everything guesses that the out of line will have the favorable position, and does close to give new proof to help this view.He basically pronounces: â€Å"You state that the best possible ruler will consider the advantage of his subjects and accordingly act evenhandedly. I state that bad form prompts a glad life and that skilled workers do focus on their own favorable position. † Whereas the shortcomings in Socrates’ recently talked about contentions are pretty much passable, there are a few factors in his next contention which make it questionable. In opening this contention, Socrates asks whether a simply man will need to exceed and outperform other just men. The two debaters concur that a simply man will regard it appropriate to outperform the unjustifiable man, yet that he won't have any desire to outperform his individual just man.The crooked man, then again, will need to outperform and show signs of improvement of everybody. Presently Socrates continues to utilize the skilled worker similarity to outline his case. With this case Socrates endeavors to demonstrate that the individuals who attempt to overextend their â€Å"like† are terrible experts. Coming back to the particular case of the specialist, he sees that a clinical man won't attempt to exceed another doctor, yet will need to exceed the non-doctor. One imperfection appears to show up now in the contention. Socrates, doubtlessly, has left no spot in this for straightforward desire here.If the primary portion of this similarity is valid, there is no space for a craftsman to progress and improve his art in a fair way, on the grounds that except if he is shameful, he won't have any aspiration to outperform his kindred specialists. Anyway this can be replied by a look back at Thrasymachus’ idea of the craftsman â€Å"in the severe sense . † No one is a craftsman to the extent that he is in mistake, so the genuine craftsman will be not able to outperform another genuine craftsman: in a perfect world, the craftsman, to the extent that he is a craftsman, will as of now practice his specialty faultlessly.Socrates finishes this contention by saying that the person who attempts to overextend the craftsman can not have genuine information on the art. At the end of the day, genuine specialists will have the option to distinguish each other and to perceive the inconceivability of outperforming one another. Since the person who needs to outperform everybody in a particular workmanship must not be a craftsman, he is uninformed of this workmanship. In this manner, Socrates guarantees, the unfair man is extremely uninformed and along these lines frail and awful. There is a checked qualification between this utilization of the skilled worker similarity and previous employments. Beforehand the similarity was utilized concer ning the â€Å"craft† of ruling.This was authentic in the setting basically on the grounds that Thrasymachus consented to this utilization. Presently notwithstanding, the subject of the similarity isn't administering, yet equity. Thrasymachus never expressly consents to this switch, and accordingly when it is made, the relationship no longer rests securely upon the shared conviction. It is not, at this point a model acknowledged by the two gatherings thus its sole support would need to lay on a target perspective on the contention. So we have another significant inquiry to look at. That is, would justice be able to be appropriately viewed as a specialty? Regardless of whether it can from an ambiguous perspective, would it be appropriately comparable to different specialties like medication or navigation?There are motivations to help a negative response to this question. For a certain something, it could be contended that equity is increasingly a way of acting, as opposed to a n art in its own right. While it is outlandish to state that one can, for instance, read a book restoratively, or in an exploring way (aside from maybe as an interesting expression), one can practice an art or play out any activity either fairly or unfairly. Equity is all the more handily viewed as a proportion of how well an activity is performed than the activity itself. The most significant thing to note here is that Socrates has moved away from the shared conviction which has recently bolstered the argument.Before, the subject of whether Socrates’ models are dispassionately legitimate was not all that critical from one perspective. For whatever length of time that Socrates was attempting to show the illogicalities inside Thrasymachus’ position, there was a lot to pick up from contentions dependent on Thrasymachus’ premises, regardless of whether the premises were valid or not. For this last contention, notwithstanding, Socrates does

Are You Living With A Psychopath Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Are You Living With A Psychopath - Essay Example In acknowledgment of the individuals who have been manhandled, genuinely, ethically or monetarily, to every one of them, particularly to Alicia C. Cussi, who lived severely misused, stripped and tormented by Teresa. Her own little girl, Alicia, propelled the making of NEW ERA ELDERLY FOUNDATION, which will open to assist with improving the old everyday environments, forestalling any sorts of older maltreatment brought about by family visual deficiency and over the top certainty to somebody who might exploit and deceive the certainty, manhandling us them without any potential repercussions. A columnist went to Ensenada, Mexico. When he arrives, he goes to a grocery store. Upon appearance, a drifter is being bound by the police, being captured on the grounds that, being so eager, he ate a bit of bread in the store. The correspondent proposals to pay for the bread, just 30 pennies, and the watchmen let the poor free. The drifter was grieved and needs to repay the revealed. He pulls from his pocket a Rolex watch that he had attempted to pawn just minutes sooner; be that as it may, from the vibe of his appearance, the pawn director had not acknowledged. The correspondent, as well, doesn’t acknowledge the watch and he is driven away by his companions to proceed with his outing. He watches out for the news and returns ordinarily to Ensenada, yet he doesn't discover the man; months after, he finds the drifter in California. The columnist chooses to lead the vagrant through the history and inspiration that he has needed to battle to fabricate an establishment to forestall the maltreatment of more established individuals who, similar to him and his mom, have been manhandled by a confided in relative.

The Song with no Motive and the Songwriter without a Clue

Breaking down melodies must be one of the least satisfying errands, since it is in every case hard to make sense of not just what thought the writer attempted to get over, yet additionally whether the author’s thought is a higher priority than the understanding of the audience.Advertising We will compose a custom exposition test on The Song with no Motive and the Songwriter without a Clue explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More There are various ways of thinking that give different responses to the given inquiry. Some state that the author’s expectation is the main substantial translation; others guarantee that, when the work is discharged, it is available to analysis and can be seen through the crystal of different people’s vision. Thus the uncertainty concerning the â€Å"Omie Wise† comes. In spite of the fact that the issue raised by Anna Domino isn't unreasonably large, it despite everything offers a fascinating contemplative into the au thor’s universe. The very truth that the writer picked composing a letter as the way to pass on her message to the crowd makes the story told in the tune of a similar name look inconceivably genuine and, in this manner, extremely contacting. The creator, consequently, brings up an extremely impossible to miss issue, asking her crowd whether the main character of a tune ought to be seen as a novel character or a nonexclusive image[1]. While the last is simpler to identify with, since it permits truly any audience to locate various purposes of contact with the picture being referred to, making a special character that has singular character characteristics and, subsequently, can be viewed as a convincing character is without a doubt a significantly more intriguing and certainly all the more testing task. Albeit a nonexclusive character ensures a moment accomplishment of a melody, being truly relatable, a one of a kind character will enable the crowd to develop by representing v arious moral inquiries and life decisions to its crowd. Offering a new gander at the old character, the writer of the article focuses on the noteworthiness of a character that the crowd can relate to. Another piece of data from The Rose and the Briar that was intended to leave an impression, the story behind â€Å"Pretty Polly† described by Rennie Sparks likewise merits being referenced as the issue that gives a ton of nourishment for considerations. As the writer asserts, the melody doesn't have any intention at all, which makes one wonder whether a tune can exist outside the fundamental guidelines of songwriting, for example, the requirement for an unmistakable thought process. From one viewpoint, the given thought appears to be totally ludicrous †being one of the key components of any melody by definition, a rationale sets the state of mind for the tune, makes the air and welcomes the crowd into its domain, also the way that an intention makes it feasible for a band o r a performer to play the tune. â€Å"Pretty Polly,† be that as it may, refutes the given standard, as Sparks demands, telling about a melody â€Å"cut from its unique epic length to frame a lean, secretive and severe people song†[2].Advertising Looking for exposition on craftsmanship and plan? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Described as a tune without an intention by the creator, it oddly makes a fascinating story canvas, hauling the crowd into it and making pictures in ones’ head; which is significantly all the more intriguing, these pictures change into bits of a riddle that fall into their places as the tune loosens up. The given in fact one of a kind marvel makes one wonder whether rationale is that significant for a melody. Albeit customarily, a thought process should be the magic that binds a tune, in the realm of present day music, different components of a melody can play out the given capacit y. For example, the creator of a melody can apparently depend entirely on music, deserting the story. Along these lines, the idea of well known music is extended to reach to the old style music, in which intention is as confused as a novel plot. Book index Domino, Anna. â€Å"Naomi Wise, 1807.† In The Rose and the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad, ed. Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus, 69â€80, New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 2010. Sparkles, Rennie. â€Å"Pretty Polly.† In The Rose and the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad, ed. Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus, 35â€50, New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 2010. References .Anna Domino, â€Å"Naomi Wise, 1807,† In The Rose and the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad, ed. Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus (New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 2010), 70. . Rennie Sparks, â€Å"Pretty Polly,† in The Rose and the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad, ed. Sean Wil entz and Greil Marcus (New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 2010): 35. This paper on The Song with no Motive and the Songwriter without a Clue was composed and put together by client Nixon Kirkland to help you with your own investigations. You are allowed to utilize it for research and reference purposes so as to compose your own paper; notwithstanding, you should refer to it as needs be. You can give your paper here.

How important is the character of Friar Lawrence to the plot and dramatic quality of Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Essay Example

How significant is the character of Friar Lawrence to the plot and sensational nature of Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Essay In my paper I will expound on the imperativeness of Friar Lawrences job, this incorporates how he fitted into the entire plot, what sensational impact he had on the crowd and in particular I will expound on the three principle parts of his job. Minister Lawrence is an essential character in the play Romeo and Juliet. The play was composed by the well known William Shakespeare around 1600 AD. The play is around two star crossed sweethearts living in the town of Verona who originate from two extraordinary driving families who completely feel disdain for each other. These two families, Montague and Capulet have been purchased up in struggle against each other as a piece of an ever-enduring quarrel between the two driving individuals from the two most significant groups of Verona.The first time Romeo and Juliet see each other is at a yearly gathering that is held at the Capulets manor. As it is a disguise party Romeo figures out how to sneak in. it is here that Romeo first observes Julie t and they begin to look all starry eyed at from the outset sight. From that point on Romeo continually meets Juliet at her chateau stealthily. In doing this the bond between them two profoundly fortifies urging them both to settle on the lethal choice of getting hitched. Realizing that their folks could never affirm of their marriage, as a piece of the antiquated fight between both their families Romeo requests that Friar Lawrence marry him and Juliet in mystery without their folks assent or blessing.The explanation behind Romeo moving toward the Friar is on the grounds that he is to a greater degree an unbiased character as he is a companion of both the Montagues and the Capulets. The Friar is aware of this old fight between the two families and is stunned when Romeo first tells the Friar that he is love with Juliet. The Friar thinks about Romeos circumstance and after long contemplations chooses to wed them. This is stunning to the crowd in light of the fact that as a man of the Christian church and a strict man he would have been relied upon to respect the estimations of their folks. This leads the crowd to think about what the Friar is up to.Friar Lawrence knows Romeo and Juliet are acting against their folks wishes and he legitimizes this by saying In one regard Ill thy associate be, for this collusion may so glad demonstrate to transform your families hostility into unadulterated love. In saying this Friar would like to accomplish harmony between both the Montagues and the Capulet accepting that Romeos marriage will unite them. This prompts there being an extremely emotional condition encompassing the crowd since they realize the couples destiny will be a sensational one from the earliest starting point of the play and by Romeo and Juliet getting one in marriage, this leads them one bit nearer to their anticipating fate. Likewise it permits the crowd to foresee what the response of their folks will be the point at which they discover of this catastrophe . At the wedding Friar Lawrence cautions the couple to cherish each other tolerably as a lot of affection would lead their relationship to ruins These fierce joys have vicious finishes, this is a case of emotional incongruity, as the crowd realize that the couple are bound to die.While this is occurring ruler Capulet is orchestrating a day for Juliet to get hitched to a good man by the name of Paris. Juliets wishes are not to wed Paris however her dad perseveres on her. Regardless of this Juliet approaches the Friar so as to look for help to discover an answer for her concern. Due to the state Juliet is in, the Friar chooses to help Juliet, to keep her from hurting herself. The Friar summarizes a dozing mixture and offers it to Juliet saying Then is it likely thou shrink attempt a thing like demise to shide away this disgrace, copst with death himself to scape from it; and, if thou darst, Ill give thee cure. In giving Juliet the dozing mixture the Friar would like to cause it to cre ate the impression that Juliet is dead on her big day when as a general rule she is in a profound rest anticipating to wake up in Romeos arms in her family internment tomb.The Friar at that point starts to uncover his arrangement to Juliet. He advises her to return home and profess to her family all is well by disclosing to her dad that shell proceed with the wedding. The Friar likewise advises her to drink his elixir the night prior to the wedding. Hold, at that point. Return home, be cheerful; offer agree to wed Paris. Wednesday is tomorrow. Tomorrow evening look that thou lie alone; Let not the medical attendant lie with thee in thy chamber. Take thou dis refined alcohol drink thou off; when by and by through all thy veins will run a cold and sluggish cleverness. The Friars plan was for Juliet to take the mixture the night prior to the wedding to show up dead the morning after.This would alleviate her of her marriage with Paris. They would have the burial service and lay her body close by her dead cousin Tybalt inside her family tomb. The Friar would then send Romeo a letter clarifying his arrangement, advising Romeo to come back from Mantua to Verona and anticipate his wanted to wake up in his arms before disappearing to Mantua liberated from their folks, to live joyfully ever after. Will Romeo by my letters know our float; and here will he come, and he and I will watch thy waking, and that very night will Romeo bear thee subsequently to Mantua.Hence the reality of something turning out badly, Juliet acknowledged the Friars plan and did as she was told. The Friar at that point sent Romeo a letter clarifying his arrangement. The Friar confided in the letter with another minister and set him to his excursion to Mantua to convey the letter. On the morning of Juliets wedding day, her Nurse gets out for her however she doesn't reply so her Nurse enters her chamber and true to form discovers Juliet dead. Juliets family surge her to Friar Lawrence for help. The F riar at that point stuns the crowd immerging a far fetched climate upon them leaving the crowd in tension to discover what occurs next when Friar Lawrence deceives Juliets family which is so surprising from a strict man of a Christian church. In repliance to Lord Capulets request for help, the Friar says Dry up your tears and stick your rosemary on this reasonable corse, and, as the custom may be, and in her best cluster, bear her to church.At Juliets burial service, Benvolio sees Juliet being conveyed to the tomb and surges looking for Romeo to let him know Juliet is dead. On his approach to Mantua, he outperforms the cleric who is to convey the Friars letter to Romeo with his arrangement, so Romeo despite everything doesn't know about what is happening. Benvolio arrives at Romeo and is asked by Romeo how is my woman Juliet? Benvolio with tears in his eyes figures out how to answer she is dead my ruler. Romeo is stunned and in transit back to see Juliet he stops to purchase poison, while on his excursion back to Verona he goes past the minister with the Friars letter, however neither of them sees one another and carry on their journey.Romeo shows up at the tomb and before entering he approaches Benvolio to sit tight for him outside. He enters the tomb and sees Juliet lying close by Tybalt. He approaches Tybalt and approaches him for absolution for having executed him. He at that point approaches Juliet and accepting she is dead beverages the toxin he purchased before on. Minutes after the fact he kicks the bucket nearby his darling Juliet. The Friar without pondering climate Romeo got his message or not accept he did and goes to get together with him in the tomb like arranged. At the point when the Friar shows up at the tomb he sees Benvolio and asks him where Romeo is and Benvolio answers in saying that Romeo is inside the tomb, the Friar at that point surges inside to see Romeo dead laying adjacent to Juliet on the floor at that exact second Juliet stirs fr om her profound rest and asks the Friar Where craftsmanship my Romeo?The Friar hears a huge group drawing closer and in frenzy of being gotten for what he has done he answers to Juliet come Ill discard thee. Among a sister hood of blessed nuns stay not to address, yet the watch is coming. Come, go, great Juliet I dare know longer remain. Juliet then will not leave with the Friar after she sees Romeos dead body lying on the floor. Seeing Romeo dead before her makes her need to murder herself. The Friar at that point disregards her inside the tomb and flees. He does this since he doesn't need the two families to discover that he was liable for the passing of Romeo and that he was acting against the desires of their folks. Juliet then pulls for Romeos knife and wounds herself. It took the passings of two honest individuals to stop this old quarrel, to at last observe sense.In the Friar coming up short on the tomb and disregarding Juliet, carries the play to a peak. The impact this woul d have on a group of people would be stunning in light of the fact that the crowd would anticipate that the Friar should take ownership of what he did as opposed to fleeing from his errors and not talking the fault for causing this tragedy.I accept that the Friar ought not be condemned for having assisted Romeo and Juliet on the grounds that he was doing it for a decent motivation which was to stopped the quarrel between the two families and unite them in piece. Then again he didn't maintain the Christian estimations of a Christian church which the crowd and myself would have expected, he ought to have been honest with Romeo and Juliet and have exhorted them to be straightforward with their folks as opposed to helping them act stealthily behind their backs. It was the Friars three primary pieces of his job which purchased the play to a peak and left the crowd anxious to discover what might occur next carrying them closer to the play.

Margaret Atwoods Tasting Menu

Margaret Atwoods Tasting Menu In November, the Wall Street Journal published “Rethinking the Familiar Book Tour,” a piece that argued bookstore readings were (or should be) a thing of the past. For many, this was not a new argument. For others, especially in less urban areas, this concept was a bold one. It has made me wonder about how bookstores, authors, and readers can work together to build better, more engaging book events.  There were no sock puppets or guitars. There were jokes, though, and even a song. Margaret Atwood may have been following a more traditional format than the Green brothers, but she still put on quite a show for the 1100 people in the audience. Atwood visited   Houston as a part of Inprints Margaret Root Brown Reading Series.   She had visited before, and the response to that visit was what made them shift the series from a small museum auditorium to the larger spaces available in the citys theater district. The turnout for this event proved that they made the right choice. Ms. Atwood began with what she referred to as a tasting menu of a reading, a few short excerpts from three of her more recent works. She started with the short story Stone Mattress, which appeared in The New Yorker last month. The story contains the subtle wit that readers have come to expect from Atwood, but when she reads it, the humor is no longer subtle. The story is funny. She is   funny, and she knows it. She even laughs at   her own jokes as she reads. With some people this might be annoying but with Atwood it is, somehow, endearing. The next item on the tasting menu was an excerpt from In Other Worlds, a collection of her essays and lectures on her relationship with speculative fiction.   This particular essay dealt with her reading of the novel She by H. Rider Haggard. I learned very little about the novel, but I learned a lot about her development as a reader:   I did not make a distinction between great literature or any other. I just liked reading.  There were more jokes and more laughter. And then she told us that she was going to sing. The final taste came in the form of a chapter from The Year of the Flood.  This particular chapter focused on one of the many religious festivals celebrated by Gods Gardners.   She read the homily offered by Adam One on Mole Day and then sang the childrens hymn that followed. It was not as grand, Im sure, as the choral performances that were included as part of the book tour for the novels 2009 release, but it was pretty impressive, nonetheless. The one element that was present in all of these readings, and that wove its way through the question-and-answer period that followed, was humor. She made us laugh. She made herself laugh. Atwood explained that she makes these jokes, that she uses humor in her writing in the way that she does, because the subjects that she tackles are hard. They would become intolerable otherwise. When the interviewer, author Robert Boswell, commented on the fact that she was laughing at her own reading, she was quick to point out that she also cries at all the sad scenes: Its not all laughs, you know. And then she made another joke. Atwood played to her audience, talking about her love of science and making geology jokes fitting for a city that has its economy based in the oil and gas industries. She discussed her accidental role as an activist and the part that Twitter has played in that. She also talked about her audience. In the beginning, she wrote for the great reader in the sky with impeccable taste. Though her understanding of how publishing and the rest of the world works has changed since those early days (she said she could write a phone book now and it would get published), she is still writing for that all-knowing reader. There are just a few carefully chosen readers whose opinions she trusts, too. It may not have had the production value that John Greens tour stop did, but the audience was more than pleased. Even the teenagers. What are some of the more notable author events that you have attended? What made them stand out? ____________________________ Cassandra Neace teaches college students how to write essays and blogs about books and book-related goodness at Indie Reader Houston. Follow her on  Twitter:  @CassandraNeace.

Study Of The Reasons Behind Company Name Changes Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

A companys name is commonly considered to be a curial part of its image and reputation, just like the quality of its products or the quality of its services and it is also widely accepted that the corporate name is the cornerstone of a companys relationship with its customers. (McNamara, 1998). Changing a companys name is a major policy decision contemplated by many firms and actually implemented by some year. Such name changes are sometimes a result of mergers or acquisitions to better describe the new combined business, and sometimes an attempt to acquire a new image and corporate identity. However, the process of changing a corporate name is painstaking, risky, and costly, therefore, name changes will not be initiated unless expected benefits outweigh expected costs (Bosch, 1989). Thus, the stock price reaction surrounding a corporate name change can be regarded as the name change effects. However, some ambivalent evident has appeared in the few studies that have considered the effect of name change on firm value. Horsky and Swyngedouw (1987) find that name change announcements can generate positive stock return. Bosch (1988) and Karpoff(1994) maintain that the name change effects are significantly positive before the announcement days but become insignificant after the announcement. Paul (1997) finds the name change effects have a significant effect on the service industry firms. Simil arly, Lee (2001) and Cooper (2001) find name change effects are large and significant positive for those firms which add .com into their name. 2 LITERARURE REVIEW Bosch and Hirschey (1989) collect 392 firms who change names from 1979 to 1986 period in Wall Street Journal (WSJ). After concerning other concurrent event such as announcement of merger and acquisition, stock split, the final sample just includes 79 name change firms. The methodology used to examine the abnormal return around the announcement actually is the market model event study. The market portfolio is the CRSP value-weighted index and the parameters are estimated over a 180-day period beginning 200 days before the announcement date and ending 21 days before ¼Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  -200 ¼Ãƒâ€¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢-21 ¼Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ °. After the test, they find that the cumulative average return (CAR) is 0.33% but insignificant for the whole event period (-10, +10). For 10 days before the name change announcement, the CAR is significantly positive with value of 2.3%, in contrast, for 10 days after the announcement, the CAR is significantly negative with -1.97%. Moreover, on the d ay of name change, the return of 0.53% is positive but insignificant. Then, the sample is further classified into 32 major and 47 minor name changes. Major name changes are whose new names are entirely different from the old, such as Varity Corp. versus Massey-Ferguson Ltd., and minor name changes would not completely affect company recognition, such as Lowen-stein M.Corp. versus M. LowensteinSons Corp. For major name changes, there is no significant effect; and Minor changes generate a significantly 0.75% positive return on the day of announcement, and also have a significantly 1.25% positive effect 5 days before the announcement. Therefore, they conclude that a positive market reaction to name change announcement is found for the overall sample but the effect is statistically weak and all firms negative valuation effects in the post-announcement period largely eliminate beneficial effects appeared during the announcement period. Karpoff and Rankine (1994) use a comparatively la rger sample of 147 firms announced name change from 1979 to 1987 in WSJ. Compared with the previous study, they mention that the WJS is not always the first public disclosure of the plan to change the companys name. Therefore the sample is divided into 4 different categories. There are 88 firms for the name change was mentioned or proposed in a proxy statement before the WSJ announcement; 87 firms refer to no concurrent announcement in the event period; 59 firms for no mention of name change in a prior proxy statement and 36 firms for which the WJS press date is not preceded by a proxy statement announcement of the name change and have no other announcements during the event period. The methodology here is also market model event study, differently; the parameters are estimated over a 200-day period beginning 31 days after the announcement date and ending 230 days after (+31, +230). The result is consistent with the Bosher (1989) and they find that the name change effect impark a si gnificantly positive cumulative return of 4.8% for 30 days before the announcement, but has no significant effect for the post-announcement. The CAR for When the authors take a close look on the 36 firms which have no concurrent event, they find those firms can generate a significant positive return of 1.56% in the two-day (-1,0 ) announcement period but yield no effect after the announcement. Therefore, this study fails to support the hypothesis that name change announcements increase shareholders wealth. Paul (1997) argue that the major problem for the previous studies is that none of them distinguished between the services and manufacturing industries. So their results may bias. He has some explanatory, such as firms in the manufacturing sector produce tangible products such as clothes, cars, computers etc. Therefore, a corporate name change signaling means a change in the direction of the firm and the quality of its products can be verified by examining the product, in contra st, the offering of service producers cannot easily achieve such verifications. Based on this, the sample only includes 28 firms from 1980 to 1990 in the service industry and the firms which changed their name because of mergers and acquisitions are excluded. Unlike the previous studies which use the market model event study approach, this study uses the trend analysis method. They focus on the trend of price per earnings ratio (P/E) because it is a good indication of the desirability of the firms share and eliminates possible size effects. They obtain P/E for five years before and after the name change for each firm and align all the events in time-order. The hypothesis is that if corporate name change signaling is effective, then post-event P/E ratios will be on average higher than pre-event P/E ratios. Finally, the trend analyses show that, on average, post-event P/E ratios are significantly higher than the pre-event P/E ratios. Therefore, corporate name change has a positive eff ect on firm in the services industry. Cooper, Dimitrov and Rau (2001) examine the effect of one particular form of corporate name change which firms add .com to their names. Concerning the concurrent announcement, the sample includes 95 publicly traded companies on the NYSE, AMEX, Nasdaq, and the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB) that changed their names between June1, 1998, and July 31, 1999. The new name has to be either a dotcom name (such as, Wareforce.com), a dotnet name (Docplus.net Corporation) or has to include the world Internet in it (e.g., Internet Solutions for Business Inc.) the sample is further classified into 4 different groups: (1) Pure internet companies, which do all their business on the internet; (2) Companies that have some prior involvement with the internet and change their name to better reflect this involvement; (3) Companies that change their focus from non-internet related business to internet-related; (4) Companies whose core business is not internet-related . Besides using the similar event study approach which parameters are estimated over a 151 days period from 30 days before the announcement and 120 days after, the author also use price-matched control group of firms to calculate the abnormal returns. That is, choosing 95 firms which did not change their names during the time period and also their price is the closest to the dotcom sample firms. Inconsistent with the previous studies, the results show that over a five-day period (-2, +2), all firms earn a strongly statistically significant abnormal return of 53%. Moreover, the name change effects of internet-related firms are the biggest which is significantly positive with 105% and the name change have the greatest long-horizon (+1, +120) effect for non-internet related firms with the value of 243%. Over the entire period from (-30, +30), all firms earn a significant return of 89% and there is also no significant reduction on CARs from day (+1, +120). Inconsistent with Bosch (1989) and Karpoff( 1994) who find a small initial positive stock price reaction to name changes is reversed within a few trading days after the announcement date. The finding suggest that firms change their name to a dotcom can experience a permanent value increase. The authors mention that maybe this is due to mania-investors seem to be eager to be connected with the Internet at all costs and this hypothesis is supported by the fact that the non-internet related firms experience the greatest long-horizon returns for the name change effects. Three years after, Cooper, Khorana, Osobov and Rau (2004) examine the stock price reactions to Internet related name changes which are .com additions and deletions in a market downturn. A sample of 183 firms that add a dot.com and 67 firms that delete a dot.com is collected from NYSE, Amex, Nasdaq, and the OTC between Jan 1, 1998 and Aug 31, 2001. The sample is divided into period of hot versus cold markets which use an empirical proxy Amex [email protected]@citve Index to measure. To be conservative, they use three different data which are Feb 1, 2000, Sep 1, 2000 and Apr 1, 2001 as the cutoff date. In order to test whether the price reaction is related to the type of name change, the sample is further separated into two types of name changes. Minor name changes refer to a firm merely adds to or deletes a dot.com from its name and Major name changes refer to a firm not only adds to or deletes dot.com from its name but also changes its name altogether. Using the same method as the previous one, the authors find no significant marker reaction towards to the hot Internet period (Pre-Feb, 2000) for dot.com deletions. In contrast, the cumulative return over the whole period (-30, +30) is significant positive with 64% after Feb, 2000. Moreover, the effect of major changes is significantly greater than the minor changes. When using a cutoff date of Sep 1, 2000, the CAR goes up to 70.2% and continues to increase to 77.5% when using the date of April, 2001. Finally, they also find the results for dot.com additions obtained by the previous study also hold in an out-of-sample period. To be more persific, the CAR for all dot.com additions from Jan, 1998 to Aug, 1999 is significantly positive with 118.6% and the major name changes have greater effect than the minor name changes on the stock price. In the boom period (Pre-Feb, 2000), the effect of dot.com additions is significantly positive with 101.8% but have no significant impact in the bust period (Post-Feb, 2000). Therefore, firms that change their name to a dot.com name in the internet boom period and delete the dot.com from their name in the internet slump period can generate large gains in shareholder wealth. 3 CONLUSION Almost all the above studies are using market model event study to measure the abnormal return. As Fama, Fisher, Jensen and Roll (1969) who first used the event study methodology to estimate the effect of the announcement of a stock split on stock prices, this methodology was widely used as an effective approach to measure the abnormal return over the event period when the value of information announced. Some implications can be drawn from the above studies. Firms can generate a significantly positive return before the announcements of name changes. Bosch (1989) and Karpoff (1994) state that the market reaction to name change announcement is positive but statistically weak as all firms negative valuation effects in the post-announcement period largely eliminate beneficial effects appeared during the announcement period. The WSJ does not publish all the news, and sometimes the news is out in other forms before it is published, so there may have a limitation in the study of Bos ch (1989) as he just uses WSJ to define the event date, therefore the results maybe bias. Although Karpoff(1994) fits this limitation, he finds the same results. Even though event date uncertainty will be a problem, the event study design is still effective. Testing accumulated excess returns over a slightly longer period allows a research to detect events without precisely examine the timing of the event. (Glenn,1990) The market may react positively just for some particular name changes in some industry. Inconsistent with Bosch (1989) and Karpoff(1994), Paul (1997) finds a significantly positive name change effect on the stock market. Cooper (2001) finds firms can experience significantly great long-horizon returns for the name change effects which add .com to their old names. Some irrational investor behavior may exist in the stock market and some manager may take advantage of this irrationality to time corporate events such as name changes. During Internet Fever, when inves tors take internet as important to how business will be managed in the future and firms also want to be identified with the internet, so .com suffix can identifies a firm with the internet, sending a clear and unambiguous signal to shareholders and the general investing public. Since internet firms may be perceived as having great potential about long-run growth and profitability, investor may be more likely invest in the firms with the announcement of .com name changes and this will contribute to an increase in stock prices and trading activity. Based on the result of Cooper (2001), Stock prices of all internet firms may be irrationally high and name change effects bring a significantly positive return of 118.6%. After testing that the non-internet related firms experience the greatest long-horizon returns for the name change effects, the behavior of Investors buying and selling activity toward firms which change their names may reflects that investors are irrationally influenced b y cosmetic effects. It is difficult to believe that investors get no information about stock holdings over the event time period. Also, Cooper (2004) examines the different stock reactions towards .com deletions and additions in internet boom and slump period. Firms that change their name to a dot.com name in the internet boom period and delete the dot.com from their name in the internet slump period both can generate large gains in shareholder wealth. In the sample, firms which add .com to their names occur mostly in the internet boom period and delete .com to their old names occur mostly in the internet slump period. It seems that firms are all obviously too eager to be detected as an Internet company while dot.com market valuations were increasing fast, but not willing to be connected with the Internet sector once it became perceived as slump. According to this, we may surmise that smart managers rationally take advantage of investors irrational behavior and do in fact try to tim e corporate events to make full use of both positive and negative investor opinions.

Women s Experiences During The Holocaust - 898 Words

While women’s experiences during the Holocaust were not entirely different from those of men, it would be false and misleading to assert that they were identical. There were many instances in which an individual’s ordeal was shaped by his or her gender and it is only by understanding what was unique to women and children, and what was unique to men, that we can provide a complete account of what occurred during the Holocaust. One of the reasons it took so long for historians to comprehend the importance of these perspectives is because women were busy rebuilding their lives after the Holocaust. It wasn’t until the 1970s when feminist scholarship was sparked, that there became an interest in the stories of women survivors. Eventually, after the women were able to put their lives back together and raise their children, it became important for them to share their memoirs. One source of gender difference during the Holocaust experience women had more anticipatory reactions towards Nazi danger. In Germany, even before the 1938 Kristallnacht pogrom, it was often the women who had to assume new roles to rescue other family members. It was assumed that the Nazis would not harm women, so it was typically women who went to the police, the SS and the municipality to protest haphazard actions against their children and families and to secure the release of husbands and sons who had been detained or arrested. In organizing and arranging the details of everyday life, such as who shouldShow MoreRelated Women and the Holocaust Essay example706 Words   |  3 PagesWomen and the Holocaust nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Jewish female is like the ovule of a flower, it spreads its seeds to create future generations. It is known that the true root of a Jewish person lies in the hands of his/her mother. As it was once said by Golda Meir, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“To be successful, a woman has to be much better at her job than a man.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬? (Golda Meir Quotes par. 1). And in fact it is true, that women had to be better than man to survive the holocaust, but not only to survive the holocaustRead MoreA Diary Every Day By Anne Frank1681 Words   |  7 PagesSix million innocent, loving, caring Jewish people were ruthlessly murdered during the Holocaust, yet there was little insight into exactly how these people were treated before their deaths. However, one girl, by the name of Anne Frank, wrote in her diary every day, unaware that her diary entries would solve this issue. She was born in the large German town of Frankfurt. Anne was an ordinary child, with dreams for her future, and friends and family who supported and loved her, unaware that she wouldRead MoreCultivating The Gardens : Candide And Night1577 Words   |  7 PagesChris Skowron Professor Dwan Simmons English 2110 November 26th, 2014 Cultivating the gardens: Candide and Night The Holocaust was a genocide in which approximately six million Jews were killed by the Nazi regime under the command of Adolf Hitler. While many did perish during the holocaust, some survived to tell the haunting tales of what they endured. One of which was a young Romanian man named Elie Wiesel, a Jewish-American professor and political activist. (The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity)Read MoreThe Trains Of Treblinka Which Carried The Prized Possessions Of The Most Horrible Events912 Words   |  4 PagesThe holocaust can be regarded as one of the most awful events in history and the swastika continues to be a constant reminder of the horrendous acts of hate that were bestowed onto human lives. More than 1 million people were brutally murdered at the hands of an evil dictator named Adolf Hitler. Some of the vivid events and actions that took place during this time have been highlighted in the poem â€Å"The Trains† written by William Heyen. Heyen discusses the trains of Treblinka which carried the prizedRead More THE HOLOCAUST Essay1711 Words   |  7 PagesTHE HOLOCAUST The Holocaust was the mass annihilation of the European Jews by the National Socialist Party (Nazi) of Germany from 1933 to 1945. In The War of the Jews, Dawidowicz explains the conditions that made anti-Semitism politically acceptable. The Germans of the nineteenth century inherited a Christian-inspired popular and intellectual anti-Semitism that depicted Jews as foreigners- a state within a state- killers of Christ, well poisoners, and a cause of every misfortune, whether naturalRead MoreThe Horrors Of The Holocaust1605 Words   |  7 PagesSpeculations about the grim events during the very horrific Holocaust are unfortunately being denied stating it was not as gruesome as many may have stated it was or did not even exist to begin with. This is not only outrageous but disrespectful to those who lost their lives during the gruesome time. History states that the Holocaust was a period in time where a very fascist dictator, Adolf Hitler, killed over six million European Jews who di d not fit the criteria of genetically having blonde hairRead MoreThe Destruction Of The Holocaust1203 Words   |  5 PagesSix million jews. Six million innocent men, women and children. Emerging from the ashes and corpses, one man had the intention of preserving this tragedy, yet at the same time preventing it. Elie Wiesel’s fulfilled his purpose of showing the heinous crimes of the Holocaust through the change of characterization of Elie before, during and after the events of Wiesel s 1940 memoir-Night. The Holocaust is remembered as a stain on history, where a massive genocide occurred. but we must also recognizeRead MoreSchindler s Morals And The Holocaust955 Words   |  4 Pages 1. Throughout the film, Oskar Schindler s morals changed as the film progressed, he transformed into caring person from an acquisitive person. Schindler is a flawed person. In the beginning of the film, Schindler s sole purpose was to make a profit of the war by hiring Jewish people and using the Jewish people s wealth to create the company. However, as Schindler s relationship with Itzhak Stern progressed and witnessing the violence towards the Jews, he started to reconsider his actions. ForRead MoreElie Wiesel s The Holocaust1315 Words   |  6 PagesThe Holocaust appeared to be a time of darkness and it seemed like on Earth and in heaven, each doorway of humanity, empathy, and kindness had been closed down. Those who did not encounter the Holocaust cannot begin to comprehend what it was like, however, those who did cannot begin to express it. Torture, genocide, and cruel acts started to fill brains and souls. The Holocaust was an event where millions of people were being murdered during World War II. The memoir, Night by Elie Wiesel is basedRead MoreThe Causes And Historical Origins Of The Gulag Archipelago1381 Words   |  6 PagesMost of books especially those written by survivors about the experience of holocaust have mainly two purposes. The first one is to record the full horror of the historical crimes such as holocaust, labor forced camps, and etc. The second one is detailed explanation and description of the causes and historical origins of that experience. The Gulag Archipelago is a three volume non-fictional book written by a famous Russian historian, novelist, story writer, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn between 1958 and

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

Do Bug Zappers Kill Mosquitoes

Mosquito bites arent just an annoyance; they can be deadly. Mosquitoes transmit serious diseases, from malaria to West Nile virus. If youre planning to spend any time outdoors, you should protect yourself from mosquito bites. Many people hang insect electrocution lights, or bug zappers, in their backyards to kill biting insects. Unfortunately, research shows that most bug zappers do little to eliminate mosquitoes. Worse, they are more likely to eliminate beneficial insects that provide food for birds, bats, and fish. How Bug Zappers Work Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. The light fixture is surrounded by a mesh cage, which is energized with a low-voltage current. Insects are drawn to the UV light, attempt to pass through the electrified mesh, and are subsequently electrocuted. Most bug zappers are designed with a collection tray where the dead insects accumulate. From dusk until dawn, homeowners with bug zappers hear the satisfying crackle of insects meeting their maker. How Mosquitoes Find Blood When evaluating mosquito control products, its important to understand how mosquitoes locate a source of blood. In other words, think about how the mosquito finds someone to bite. Regardless of whether theyre human, canine, equine, or avian, all living blood sources emit carbon dioxide. Mosquitoes, like most biting insects, can home in on the scent of carbon dioxide in the air. Research suggests a bloodthirsty mosquito can detect carbon dioxide from as far as 35 meters away from its source. At the slightest hint of CO2, the mosquito begins flying in zigzags, using trial and error to pinpoint the person or animal in the area. Carbon dioxide is the most powerful attractant for mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also use other scent clues to find people to bite. Perfume, sweat, and even body odor can attract mosquitoes. Research Proves Bug Zappers Are Ineffective for Killing Mosquitoes Bug zappers attract insects using ultraviolet light. Mosquitoes find their blood meals by following the trail of carbon dioxide. Occasionally, a mosquito will get curious about the pretty light and make the fatal mistake of getting too close. But theres no guarantee that mosquito is even a female, and therefore  a biting mosquito. In fact, many of the mosquitoes found in bug zappers are actually nonbiting insects called midges. In 1977, researchers from the University of Guelph conducted a study to determine how effective bug zapper products are at killing mosquitoes and reducing mosquito populations where they are used. They found that just 4.1% of the insects killed in the bug zappers were female (and therefore biting) mosquitoes. The study also found the yards with bug zappers had higher numbers of female mosquitoes than those without bug zappers. University of Notre Dame researchers conducted a similar study in 1982, with similar results. In an average night, a single bug zapper in South Bend, Indiana, killed 3,212 insects, but only 3.3% of the dead insects were female mosquitoes. In addition, these researchers found that the UV light seemed to draw more mosquitoes to the area, leading to more mosquito bites.   In 1996, researchers at the University of Delaware tallied an entire summers worth of dead bugs from bug zappers. Of a total of 13,789 insects killed in the bug zappers, a paltry 0.22%  of them were biting mosquitoes or gnats. Worse, almost half of the dead insects were harmless, aquatic insects, an important food for fish and other stream inhabitants. These insects help control pest insect populations, meaning bug zappers could actually make pest problems worse. Scientists at the UF/IFAS Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach, Florida, also examined the effectiveness of bug zappers in 1997. A single bug zapper in their study killed 10,000 insects in one night, but just eight of the dead bugs were mosquitoes. New Octenol Bug Zappers In recent years, a new type of zapper has appeared on the market that uses carbon dioxide and octenol—a nontoxic, pesticide-free pheromone—to attract mosquitoes. Logically, this new type of zapper should attract and kill more mosquitoes, leaving your yard pest-free. Unfortunately, studies show that octenol does little to increase the number of mosquitoes killed per night. Instead, it attracts even more mosquitoes to your yard, while killing about the same number of pests as a strip of sticky tape. Study after study has proven that bug zappers do very little or nothing at all to put a dent in the biting mosquito population. On the other hand, limiting mosquito breeding habitat and using appropriate mosquito deterrents like DEET does protect you from mosquito bites, and from the diseases mosquitoes carry. Sources Surgeoner, G. A., and B. V. Helson. 1977. A field evaluation of electrocutors for mosquito control in southern Ontario. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 108:53–58.Nasci, RS, CW. Harris and CK Porter. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosquito News. 43:180–184.Frick, TB and DW Tallamy. 1996. Density and diversity of nontarget insects killed by suburban electric insect traps. Ent. News. 107:77-82.University Of Florida, Institute Of Food Agricultural Sciences, 1997. Snap! Crackle! Pop! Electric Bug Zappers Are Useless For Controlling Mosquitoes, Says UF/IFAS Pest Expert Accessed September 4, 2012.

The Roles Of Women In Parlement Of Foules By Geoffrey Chaucer

Today, women are treated with a respect and love that past generations would have dreamed about. Simple privileges like being allowed to have a job and get an education are taken so for granted, because fortunately it is all this generation has known. Women have always been strong capable beings that are fit to do a job that is typically given to a man, and probably with more efficiency. Figuratively in the poem Parlement of Foules by Geoffrey Chaucer and quite literally in the Speech to the Troops at Tilbury by Queen Elizabeth, women hold a powerful role in the writing and/or execution of these works through leadership roles and also through sexuality. Women are wonderful creatures and are capable of incredible things, yet the fact that a†¦show more content†¦In this poem, the way Chaucer writes about relationships and specifically a woman’s role in the relationship is a mindset and a step in women’s rights that did not become popular and accepted for hundreds of years later. In Speech to the Troops at Tilbury, the queen’s words are oozing with power and authority. The queen begins her speech addressing the crowd as â€Å"My loving people† (Queen Elizabeth). This immediately establishes her power and authority before even beginning to deliver her speech. Her place on the throne was her birthright, yet, because she is a woman, she is doubted of her abilities to rule a kingdom. Through giving this speech, Queen Elizabeth aims to prove that she intends to do all in her power to work with the troops and protect their land. Through her mighty words, she claims her kingdom and she claims the respect that she rightfully deserves. She plays on the assumption that women are weak and powerless, â€Å"I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart and stomach of a king† (Queen Elizabeth). During the renaissance era, the average woman did not have essentially any power, much like the medieval era. This is a woman†™s place in the renaissance period as told by the writer Suzanne Hull: â€Å"When England was ruled for half a century by Queens but women had almost no legal power; When marriage, a women’s main vocation, cost them their personal property rights; when the ideal women wasShow MoreRelatedWho Was Geoffrey Chaucer?888 Words   |  4 PagesWho was Geoffrey Chaucer? One of the most unique poets of during the Middle Ages was Geoffrey Chaucer. He was born in London sometime between 1340 and 1344. His parents were John Chaucer and Agnes Copton. John Chaucer was an affluent wine merchant and deputy to the king’s butler. Geoffrey held several opportunities early in his life serving as a noblewoman’s page, a courtier, a diplomat, a civil servant, and a collector of scrap metal. He was given theses oppurtunities because of who his father was

The Fao ( Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United...

The FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) carries one main effort, which is to achieve food security for everyone around the world. Their goals include the elimination of hunger, food insecurity, malnutrition, and poverty. Not only do they want to focus on food and agriculture, but they also want to drive forward the economic and social progress for all. In essence, they strive to create sustainability and resilience. Sustainability is a development that meets the needs of the present but does not take away the capability of meeting the needs of future generations. Resilience is the ability of people, many in communities that are confronted by disasters, to withstand damage and undergo rapid recovery. The FAO seeks to create sustainability and resilience to improve our world for the present times, which will positively affect the future times. The FAO has been helping people since it was founded in 1945. Today, the FAO still help people, like the ones in Haiti that were just devastated by Hurricane Matthew. 800,000 people faced a lack of food security, and the FAO took actions immediately along with other food and health organizations. This instance is a perfect example that food security is an international problem. Not only do people face it in poor countries like Haiti, but even the United States faces food insecurity. In 2014, and estimated 14% of household owners faced food insecurity. Recently, on September 7, 2016, the USDAShow MoreRelatedLivestock Disease and African Food Security Essay1043 Words   |  5 PagesDisease and African Food Security A serious problem in Africa today is the emergence of rampant, deadly strains of disease that are affecting livestock and ravaging populations of pigs and cattle in many African nations, putting food security at risk in many populations of various nations. With already major food scarcity issues among many emerging African nations, disease will only furtherRead MoreLester B. Pearson s Greatest Prime Minister1194 Words   |  5 Pagesfor his time at United Nations and serving as Canada’s prime minister. Lester B. Pearson is one of Canada’s greatest prime minister because of his service towards Canada in his lifetime.. Lester B. Pearson helped Canada greatly during his time out of office. Firstly, Lester B. Pearson has helped Canada to become recognizable through various platforms. One of the greatest platforms was the United Nations. Therefore, Canada recognised the opportunity of joining the United Nations to be recognisedRead MoreThe Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations847 Words   |  4 PagesThe Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defines certified organic products as â€Å" those which have been produced, stored, processed, handled and marketed in accordance with precise technical specifications (standards) and certified as organic by a certification body† (FAO, 1999). Here, this is a common definition oriented by the production process of the â€Å"organic† product and the label of verification of a certification body as opposed to and verification of product qualityRead MoreThe Realization Of National Food Security1663 Words   |   7 PagesThe realization of national food security is a key objective in the agricultural sector. A recent research showed that over 10million people are food insecure with majority of these people living on food relief. The government of Kenya with the support of various organizations has worked to ensure that the Kenyans are food secure. In 2008, the Kenyan government launched the Kenya Vision 2030 which was a long-term development blueprint for the country. Its objective ia mainly to create a globallyRead MoreThe Effects Of Organic Farming On The Environment1678 Words   |  7 PagesAgriculture has gone through a tremendous change over the last one hundred and fifty years, from family farms to formidable industrial agriculture. Combined with the changes in agriculture, changes have taken place in our environment as well. Industrial agriculture has led to soil degradation, ground water contamination, and prodigious amounts of fossil fuel and water usage. Organic farming is a way to combat these detrimental environmental effects, by avoiding chemical fertilizers and herbicidesRead MoreThe Overlooked Area Of Poverty Essay1292 Words   |  6 Pages30 percent of the developing countries by 2015 (United Nations, 2005). Even though these targets have been almost achieved; it was predicted that there are about 825 million of citizen still live in extreme poverty and 800 million still suffer from inadequate hunger (FAO, 2015). Thus, fighting against poverty and hunger remains the enormous challenge. Then, an inevitable question arises as to whether the persistence of poverty was well-defined. FAO (2015) also have noticed that extreme poverty mainlyRead MoreHuman Geography : Increasing Population And Agriculture1123 Words   |  5 PagesPopulation Agriculture Increasing human population and industrial agriculture go hand and hand. Currently, there are 7.4 billion people in the world and it continues to grow rapidly and the demand to meet the needs for our growing population remains to be an overwhelming task. Agriculture is the practice of farming, including cultivation of the soil for the growing of crops and the rearing of animals to provide food, wool, and other products. Deforestation is by-product of agriculture in which weRead MoreWorld Organization For Animal Health Organizations828 Words   |  4 Pagestransboundary animal diseases, has become a concern worldwide as international trades increase and foreign investment restrictions loosen in the recent decades. Transboundary animal diseases, defined as â€Å"those that are of significant economic, trade and/or food security importance for a considerable number of countries; which can easily spread to other countries and reach epidemic proportions; and where control/management, in cluding exclusion, requires cooperation between several countries,† can be difficultRead MoreOrganic Farming is a Sustainable System of Agriculture1793 Words   |  7 Pagessystem of agriculture because it builds a toxin free biologically diverse ecosystem, controls soil erosion, and enhances the quality of air and water by reducing the hazardous chemicals. Annotation: Source-1: Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations (n.d.). Environmental benefits of organic agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq6/en/ This source is the information provided by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedRead MoreFinal Project: Overview of FAOs Strategic Planning Essay6158 Words   |  25 Pagesï » ¿ Final Project: Overview of FAO Strategic Planning William D. Towah Walden University The Final Project: Strategic Plan Abstract Strategic planning is a fundamental framework that engenders growth of every organization; it provides the procedures necessary that would enable an organization to achieve its mandate, mission and vision of success, and thereby providing public value. This final project identifies and analysis the characteristics of strategic planning and implementation processes